Prosecutors claim that Todd and Julie Chrisley forced Nanny Faye to “take the stand and lie” to “victimize” her.

Prosecutors claim that Todd and Julie Chrisley forced Nanny Faye to "take the stand and lie" to "victimize" her.

According to federal prosecutors, Todd and Julie Chrisley allegedly asked his mother to lie under oath. The accusations were made during the couple’s fraud convictions’ sentencing session. 

The couple’s impact on Faye Chrisley’s testimony, according to the defense, is not supported by any evidence. Each every day, top editors send the articles you desire straight to your inbox. Inbox address Elizabeth “Faye” Chrisley, Todd Chrisley’s 77-year-old mother, was accused by a federal prosecutor in Atlanta of lying under oath during her son and daughter-in-trial law’s at their behest.

At the reality TV couple’s Monday sentencing for their years-long scheme in which they defrauded banks and the IRS to live a luxurious lifestyle, Assistant US Attorney Annalise Peters said, “They used her to help further their crime and, frankly, victimized her by asking her to take the stand and lie.” A federal jury in Atlanta found Todd and Julie Chrisley, stars of the USA Network reality series “Chrisley Knows Best,” guilty of several conspiracy and fraud-related offenses in June.

Prosecutors testified at the trial that the pair tried to transfer their “7C’s Productions” bank account, where they were paid for their show, into Todd Chrisley’s mother’s name when they recognized their fraud scheme was failing. On the show, Faye Chrisley, who goes by the name Nanny Faye, admitted to prosecutors that she didn’t know why she was listed as the account’s owner and that she doesn’t read the paperwork before signing it.

Faye Chrisley informed Peters in June, “Honey, I had never been involved with anything but be a signer. “Never have I owned it. I do not desire it.”

As Peters recalled at the sentence, she also said that when she and Julie Chrisley went to the bank to open a new account in Faye’s name, they went back the following day and changed it back.

At trial, a bank employee stated that Julie Chrisley never returned to the bank the following day and that the bank would never have accepted such a changed document.

Donna Cash, a different witness, was charged by Peters with lying under oath during the trial.

Former worker Cash, who worked for the Chrisleys, claimed that she lied about the company’s health and delivered phony financial records to lenders at the order of her supervisor Mark Braddock, who ultimately turned the Chrisleys in.

When the Chrisleys’ family home was about to go into foreclosure, she allegedly stopped forging paperwork.

A bank employee testified throughout the trial that Julie Chrisley didn’t come back the next day and that the bank would never have accepted a modified document. Donna Cash, a different witness, was charged by Peters with lying under oath during the trial. Former worker Cash, who worked for the Chrisleys, claimed that she lied about the company’s health and delivered phony financial records to lenders at the order of her supervisor Mark Braddock, who ultimately turned the Chrisleys in.

When the Chrisleys’ family home was about to go into foreclosure, she allegedly stopped forging paperwork. Cash testified in court while crying, saying, “I did some awful things, but there was one thing I wasn’t going to do.” Peters claimed Cash was fabricating information to shield Todd Chrisley, who was actually the fraud’s mastermind; however, the Chrisleys’ defense attorneys argued there is no proof their clients directed witnesses’ testimony.

Todd Chrisley was given a 12-year prison term on Monday. Julie Chrisley received a seven-year sentence. Following their committed time, they will both complete three years of supervised release. Todd and Julie Chrisley “lie and cheat” at every opportunity, Peters remarked in court on Monday, calling them “a walking crime wave.”

About the Author

You may also like these